In reply to:
Pav
@PaulRS123
·
537d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
538d
The statement 'Um, no not communism' is a brief rebuttal to a previous comment suggesting that a search for purpose and meaning in national life equates to communism. The tone is dismissive and corrective, aiming to refute the association made by the previous commenter.
- The statement does not cause harm with words and actions. It is a simple rebuttal without any harmful language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it also does not detract from these values.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of dialogue by refuting a point, but it does not provide constructive criticism or engage deeply with the argument. It is a brief dismissal rather than a substantive engagement.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly, though it could be more constructive. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.