Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
5/23/2024, 4:36:00 PM
X
In reply to:
✨HedgeEgo✨
@MarginCall4
·
627d
@ylecun Dr. LeCun, thank you for bringing refreshing truth to the AI hype landscape. People with financial incentives tied to AI valuation are pumping public with AGI delusion. You and @GaryMarcus are keeping a check on this madness.
Yann LeCun
@ylecun
·
627d
Nice article in Financial Time where I explain that Auto-Regressive LLM are insufficient to reach human-level intelligence (or even cat-level intelligence).

But alternative architectures that I call "objective driven" may reach human-level intelligence one day.
They use world…
Financial Times
@FT
·
628d
Yann LeCun says he is working to develop an entirely new generation of AI systems that he hopes will power machines with human-level intelligence. It could take up to 10 years to achieve, he tells the @FT in an interview https://www.ft.com/content/23fab…

The statement 'dude blocked me so i can’t see what you are replying to' is a response to a conversation about AI and its future capabilities. The tone is informal and somewhat frustrated, indicating a personal grievance about being blocked by another user. This statement does not contribute substantively to the public discourse on AI and its implications, but rather focuses on a personal interaction.

  1. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it publicly mentions being blocked by another user, which could be seen as a form of public shaming. This is a minor violation. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on a personal grievance rather than contributing to a constructive discussion. This is a minor violation. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it highlights a personal issue without addressing the topic at hand. This is a minor violation. [-1]