Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
5/23/2024, 4:40:39 PM
X
In reply to:
✨HedgeEgo✨
@MarginCall4
·
627d
@GaryMarcus @ylecun
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
627d
@MarginCall4 @ylecun dude blocked me so i can’t see what you are replying to
✨HedgeEgo✨
@MarginCall4
·
627d
@ylecun Dr. LeCun, thank you for bringing refreshing truth to the AI hype landscape. People with financial incentives tied to AI valuation are pumping public with AGI delusion. You and @GaryMarcus are keeping a check on this madness.
Yann LeCun
@ylecun
·
627d
Nice article in Financial Time where I explain that Auto-Regressive LLM are insufficient to reach human-level intelligence (or even cat-level intelligence).

But alternative architectures that I call "objective driven" may reach human-level intelligence one day.
They use world…
Financial Times
@FT
·
628d
Yann LeCun says he is working to develop an entirely new generation of AI systems that he hopes will power machines with human-level intelligence. It could take up to 10 years to achieve, he tells the @FT in an interview https://www.ft.com/content/23fab…

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the development and limitations of AI technology, a significant public issue. The tone of the statement is somewhat defensive and implies a sense of vindication, suggesting that the speaker's previous views, which were mocked, are now being validated.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies past mockery, which could be seen as a minor violation of striving to do no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the mention of being mocked could be seen as a minor violation of respecting the dignity of others. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, and instead focuses on personal vindication. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue and instead focuses on a personal grievance, which could be seen as a minor violation of engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]