Marianne Williamson

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score -6
5/28/2024, 5:19:25 PM
X
In reply to:
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
534d
The current electoral disaster - Trump high in the polls - was completely preventable. Biden’s anointment was a cynical managerial decision made by a few and acquiesced to by a whole lot of people who should have known better. 5/7
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
534d
Coup managers keep strict control; a political-media industrial complex polices the system so no one gets past the gates if he or she questions the basic tenets of a corporate controlled economy. “We have to go with Joe because he’s the one who can win” was a ruse from the…
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
534d
For the last 50 years, there has been a corporate coup in this country - shattering the promises of democracy, abolishing the middle class and leaving the majority of Americans in some mode of economic struggle. We’ve been living with a sociopath in the house for decades. 3/7
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
534d
Fascism now definitely threatens. But who do you blame at a certain point - the thief, or the people in the house who opened every door and every window making it so easy for him to come in? 2/7
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
534d
Franklin Roosevelt said we wouldn’t have to worry about a fascist takeover in this country as long as democracy delivered on its promises. 1/7

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the political process, specifically the practice of primarying an incumbent president and the qualifications of political candidates. The tone is confrontational and critical, aiming to challenge the status quo and the decisions made by political elites.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('my ass') which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of strong language could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of others. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote critical thinking and challenge existing political norms, which can be seen as promoting understanding and empathy for those who feel disenfranchised. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the political system and those who support it, but the use of strong language could be seen as a personal attack on those who hold different views. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to challenge the political status quo, which can be seen as an attempt to use influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by expressing a critical opinion on political matters, but the use of strong language could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity.