Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
6/1/2024, 7:41:19 PM
X
In reply to:
ben
@benzion_b
·
619d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk @sama https://www.perplexity.ai/search…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
619d
@benzion_b @elonmusk @sama Reference for that date?
ben
@benzion_b
·
619d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk @sama they’ve been pretty public about gpt-4 being more or less done by august 2022 when they showed it to bill gates at a dinner

imo they’re sitting on a way more powerful model already
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
619d
Incredible. @elonmusk is here mocking my claims of diminishing returns and @sama just let slip that GPT-4 goes back at least to November 2022.

We are talking 18 months and > $50 billion without a major bump, and no real solution to hallucinations, unreliability, poor reasoning…
C Chaitanya
@nutanc
·
619d
So OpenAi had already trained GPT-4 by the time they released ChatGPT?

So basically we have not had a better model(even by OpenAI) for the last 2 years?

The statement in question is part of a larger conversation about the development and release timeline of GPT-4, a significant public issue related to artificial intelligence and its impact on society. The tone is inquisitive and skeptical, aiming to verify the legitimacy of a source and expressing caution about taking LLM (Large Language Model) output as authoritative.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is focused on seeking clarity and truth, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By questioning the legitimacy of the link and expressing caution about LLM outputs, the statement promotes understanding and critical thinking, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking for verification and does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by seeking to verify information and encouraging critical evaluation. [+1]