Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
6/1/2024, 7:41:43 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
618d
@benzion_b @elonmusk @sama What’s the actual link they give? Is it legit? I would never take LLM output as an authoritative source and can click through your screenshot
ben
@benzion_b
·
618d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk @sama https://www.perplexity.ai/search…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
618d
@benzion_b @elonmusk @sama Reference for that date?
ben
@benzion_b
·
618d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk @sama they’ve been pretty public about gpt-4 being more or less done by august 2022 when they showed it to bill gates at a dinner

imo they’re sitting on a way more powerful model already
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
618d
Incredible. @elonmusk is here mocking my claims of diminishing returns and @sama just let slip that GPT-4 goes back at least to November 2022.

We are talking 18 months and > $50 billion without a major bump, and no real solution to hallucinations, unreliability, poor reasoning…
C Chaitanya
@nutanc
·
618d
So OpenAi had already trained GPT-4 by the time they released ChatGPT?

So basically we have not had a better model(even by OpenAI) for the last 2 years?

The statement in question is a brief comment in a Twitter thread discussing the development timeline of GPT-4. It does not substantively engage with public issues, policies, or societal concerns. Instead, it is part of a technical discussion about the timeline and capabilities of a specific AI model. Therefore, it does not constitute public discourse.