Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
6/1/2024, 7:42:34 PM
X
In reply to:
alth0u🤸
@alth0u
·
618d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk @sama how markedly different would the approach have to be to be different to you? maybe active parameters dont increase by 10x?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
618d
@alth0u @elonmusk @sama If it’s two years it might be a whole different approach?
alth0u🤸
@alth0u
·
618d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk @sama would you consider yourself proven wrong if there is something markedly better within the year or two? its odd to me to think nothing demonstrably better wont appear within the year or two
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
618d
Incredible. @elonmusk is here mocking my claims of diminishing returns and @sama just let slip that GPT-4 goes back at least to November 2022.

We are talking 18 months and > $50 billion without a major bump, and no real solution to hallucinations, unreliability, poor reasoning…
C Chaitanya
@nutanc
·
618d
So OpenAi had already trained GPT-4 by the time they released ChatGPT?

So basically we have not had a better model(even by OpenAI) for the last 2 years?

The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the development and effectiveness of AI models, specifically GPT-4, and the broader implications for AI technology. The tone is competitive and somewhat boastful, indicating a strong belief in the neurosymbolic approach to AI.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the competitive tone could potentially escalate tensions in the discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on the competitive aspect of AI development. No points allocated.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the technical aspects of AI development. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the influence of the speaker to contribute to the discussion on AI development, which is a significant societal issue. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+2]