Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement and the referenced conversations constitute public discourse as they engage with substantive issues related to AI development, investment, and the claims of experts in the field. The tone is analytical and reflective, aiming to discuss the validity of predictions about AI technology.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a reflection on past beliefs and expert opinions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by reflecting on the accuracy of expert predictions and the current state of AI technology. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by referencing expert opinions and past conversations without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.