Gary Marcus

The statement and the linked article engage in public discourse by discussing a public debate between two prominent figures, Elon Musk and Yann LeCun, on the topic of scientific publication and reproducibility. The conversation touches on important issues related to scientific integrity, peer review, and public communication of research findings.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement and linked article do not appear to cause harm directly. However, the description of the debate as a 'brawl' and the mention that neither party 'kept things above the belt' suggests a contentious and potentially harmful exchange. This could be seen as a minor violation of the principle to do no harm with words and actions. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved by focusing on their public statements and actions rather than personal attacks. This aligns with the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement and linked article aim to promote understanding by providing an analysis of the debate and the issues at hand. This aligns with the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by analyzing the public debate and the arguments presented by both parties. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, which aligns with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   By discussing a public debate on an important issue, the statement uses its platform to contribute to the betterment of society by fostering public understanding and dialogue. This aligns with the principle of using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]