Gary Marcus

The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in a public discourse about the authenticity of a quote attributed to a public figure. The discussion involves verifying the accuracy of information shared in a public forum, which is a relevant public issue in the context of online discourse and misinformation.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does address the potential harm of spreading misinformation. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the accuracy of the information rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the authenticity of the quote, which can help prevent the spread of misinformation. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the issue of misinformation without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]