+3
In reply to:
Sotiris eu/acc (🇬🇷🇪🇺🇺🇸 🏴)
@skaragiannis
·
616d
The statement and the linked article constitute public discourse as they engage with a public issue involving prominent figures in the tech industry, Elon Musk and Yann LeCun, and their public disagreement. The statement provides an opinion on the matter and contributes to the civic dialogue by discussing the behavior of these public figures.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does mention that neither Musk nor LeCun kept things 'above the belt,' implying some level of harm in their actions. This is a neutral point as it does not directly cause harm but acknowledges harm done by others.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It merely comments on the public actions of Musk and LeCun. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on providing an opinion on the public behavior of Musk and LeCun.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by analyzing the actions of Musk and LeCun without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It maintains a level of objectivity. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing an informed opinion on a public issue without resorting to inflammatory language. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.