Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
6/6/2024, 4:10:36 PM
X
In reply to:
James Villarrubia
@james_mtc
·
611d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk @ylecun Well let's also publicly celebrate Shotwell, Juncosa, Kuehmann, etc..

Musk is clearly distracted with numerous other companies. Hard to believe his contribution is much beyond "sponsorship." I'm saying put him on the list if you want, but don't make it the only one.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
611d
@james_mtc @elonmusk @ylecun That doesn’t seem fair to me. Gwynne Shotwell surely gets a *ton* of credit, as do many individual engineers, but no Elon, no SpaceX, no reusable Starship.

I give Elon a hard time on many things, but also give credit where credit is due.
James Villarrubia
@james_mtc
·
611d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk @ylecun Sorry... what did Elon Musk contribute to this? Congrats to the engineers... not the sponsor.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
611d
Congratulations, @elonmusk, on Starship’s successful There and Back Again!

You will not be forgotten, regardless of what certain myopic ML experts named @Ylecun might have implied.

You don’t need to publish to the change the world.

The statement engages in a public discourse about the contributions of various individuals to SpaceX's achievements, specifically the successful return of the Starship rocket. The tone is defensive and aims to correct what the author perceives as an unfair characterization of Elon Musk's role. The intent is to acknowledge the team effort while disputing the notion that Musk's contribution is merely sponsorship.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by acknowledging the team effort and correcting a perceived unfair characterization. However, it could be seen as dismissive of the original commenter's perspective. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or revealing private information. It focuses on the contributions to SpaceX rather than personal attributes. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging the team effort and the contributions of others. However, it could have been more empathetic towards the original commenter's viewpoint.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the perceived unfairness in the original comment. It does not engage in personal attacks but could have been more diplomatic in its language.