Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47

Score 84

@james_mtc @elonmusk @ylecun That doesn’t seem fair to me. Gwynne Shotwell surely gets a *ton* of credit, as do many individual engineers, but no Elon, no SpaceX, no reusable Starship.

I give Elon a hard time on many things, but also give credit where credit is due.

6/6/2024, 4:07:40 PM

In reply to:

James Villarrubia

@james_mtc

611d

@GaryMarcus @elonmusk @ylecun Sorry... what did Elon Musk contribute to this? Congrats to the engineers... not the sponsor.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

611d

Congratulations, @elonmusk, on Starship’s successful There and Back Again!

You will not be forgotten, regardless of what certain myopic ML experts named @Ylecun might have implied.

You don’t need to publish to the change the world.

The statement engages in a public discussion about the contributions of Elon Musk and other individuals to the success of SpaceX's Starship project. It acknowledges the efforts of engineers and other key figures while also giving credit to Elon Musk for his role in the project. The tone is balanced, aiming to provide a fair assessment of contributions.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm by acknowledging the contributions of various individuals, including Elon Musk, without disparaging others. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding and empathy by recognizing the efforts of both the engineers and Elon Musk, fostering a more comprehensive appreciation of the project's success. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a disagreement respectfully and providing a reasoned argument for giving credit to Elon Musk. [+1]