Gary Marcus

The statement and the accompanying conversation address significant public issues related to privacy, data security, and corporate accountability. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, aiming to highlight perceived irresponsibility and potential risks associated with Microsoft's AI Recall feature. The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by discussing the implications of a major tech company's actions on user privacy and security.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to hold a corporation accountable for potential harm, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the use of strong language ('fuck up') could be seen as unprofessional and potentially harmful in its own right.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals but is critical of a corporation. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding and awareness of potential privacy and security issues, encouraging scrutiny and caution among users. [+2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism of Microsoft's practices, though the tone is sarcastic and could be perceived as mocking rather than fostering constructive dialogue.
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about important privacy and security issues, contributing to the betterment of society by encouraging vigilance and accountability. [+2]