The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing the issue of liability for AI companies and the potential societal impact of AI-related harms. The tone is critical and aims to highlight the importance of holding AI companies accountable for significant damages.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for accountability and protection of the public from large-scale damages caused by AI. This aligns with the principle of minimizing harm. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the issue rather than engaging in personal attacks or harassment. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the potential negative externalities of AI and the burden on taxpayers if companies are not held liable. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of Andrew Ng's position, providing a reasoned argument against his viewpoint without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for societal betterment by calling for responsible AI practices and accountability. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.