In reply to:
Thomas G. Dietterich
@tdietterich
·
535d
Common Sense Doge ⏸️
@commonsensedoge
·
535d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of AI regulation and the specific bill, CA SB-1047. It questions the sincerity of companies that claim to support regulation but do not support this particular bill, and it calls for these companies to propose alternatives if they oppose the bill. The tone is critical and seeks accountability from companies in the AI industry.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a critical but constructive inquiry into the actions of companies regarding AI regulation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by encouraging a dialogue about the need for regulation and the responsibilities of AI companies. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue, asking for alternatives and solutions rather than engaging in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to call for accountability and betterment of society by addressing the need for responsible AI regulation. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.