Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 94

The statement raises a significant public issue regarding the accountability and responsibility for potential harms caused by AI. It prompts a discussion on the ethical and legal implications of AI technology, which is a substantive engagement with a public concern.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but rather seeks to address potential future harms, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By raising a question about accountability, the statement promotes understanding and empathy towards those who might be affected by AI-related harms. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement invites constructive dialogue on a complex issue without engaging in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to discuss a significant societal issue, aiming for the betterment of society by addressing potential risks of AI. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss an important public concern. [+1]