Gary Marcus

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 65
6/8/2024, 2:50:05 PM
X
In reply to:
Ethan Mollick
@emollick
·
535d
Alignment, of a sort: this paper conducts what they call a “moral Turing Test,” asking people to compare GPT-4o to humans on ethical questions.

“Here we find that LLMs appear to have a strong aptitude for moral reasoning on par with expert ethicists.” https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxi…

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with the topic of AI's capability in moral reasoning, which is a significant societal issue. The tone is apologetic and corrective, aiming to clarify a previous misunderstanding about the research papers discussed.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by apologizing for the confusion and clarifying the mistake, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the error and providing a correction, which fosters a more accurate and informed discussion. [+1]
  3. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement acknowledges and corrects a mistake, which aligns well with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+2]