In reply to:
The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in a discussion about the validity and quality of a research paper, which is a substantive engagement with public issues in the academic and scientific community. The tone is respectful and aims to clarify a misunderstanding while providing constructive feedback on the research paper.
- The statement strives to do no harm and corrects a case of mistaken identity, which is a responsible and respectful action. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the identity of the paper's author and acknowledging the value of criticisms of preprints. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the concern about construct validity and the importance of measurement clarity in research. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.