Reposted by Vivek Ramaswamy
Lauren Boebert
@laurenboebert
·
584d
The statement and the referenced conversation constitute public discourse as they engage with the public issue of immigration and border security, which are significant societal concerns.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does support a potentially divisive viewpoint without providing a balanced perspective.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does indirectly support a narrative that could stigmatize certain groups. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it rather reinforces a partisan viewpoint. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it instead supports a specific viewpoint without addressing counterarguments or fostering discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform to promote a balanced or responsible discourse.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.