Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 65
6/11/2024, 6:30:12 PM
X
In reply to:
Dominick Romano
@dromanocpm
·
530d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk Has nothing to do with the video you shared, it’s not just being remotely considered, it’s happening.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
530d
@dromanocpm @elonmusk But is it being remotely considered?
Dominick Romano
@dromanocpm
·
530d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk Gary, this is for Apple functionality and is 100% unrelated to Elon’s complaint that an OS Level OpenAI Client that directs data out of the device and to OpenAI shouldn’t even be remotely considered, the fact it will exist is problematic for security. Elon is 100% justified here.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
530d
I think @elonmusk owes Apple an apology. I won’t say this is perfect (hackers will inevitably find problems), but it seems to me to be quite thoughtfully conceived, and likely is state of the art.
Max Weinbach
@MaxWinebach
·
531d
This is from Apple's State of the Union

The local model is a 3B parameter SLM that uses adapters trained for each specific feature. Diffusion model does the same thing, adapter for each style.

Anything running locally or Apple's Secure Cloud is an Apple model, not OpenAI.

The statement engages in a discussion about the potential integration of OpenAI technology into Apple's operating system and the security implications of such an integration. It references a quote attributed to Elon Musk and provides a counterpoint to the concerns raised, suggesting that the level of integration being discussed is not as extensive as feared. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant issue related to technology, security, and corporate policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm and instead seeks to clarify a misunderstanding, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the issue rather than engaging in personal attacks or harassment. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By attempting to clarify the level of integration being discussed, the statement promotes understanding and empathy, aligning with the principle of using words to promote understanding. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific concern and providing a counterpoint, rather than attacking the individuals involved, which aligns with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]