Gary Marcus

The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the implications of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and its potential risks and benefits. It addresses a public issue related to technology and its impact on society, making it a part of public discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not use harmful language and instead focuses on a reasoned argument, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by challenging an assumption and encouraging a more nuanced view of AGI, thus aligning with the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+2]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the hidden assumption in the original tweet without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, thus adhering to the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [+2]