In reply to:
0° Gemmie
@Kuri_G
·
431d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
431d
The statement by @Kuri_G constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the political influence of Southern Baptists on IVF policies, which affects many Americans. The tone is assertive and aims to counter the previous claim that the opinion of Southern Baptist women does not matter to others.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a factual rebuttal rather than a harmful attack. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by highlighting the political influence of Southern Baptists on IVF policies, which can foster empathy and compassion for those affected. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a counterpoint to the previous comment without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.