In reply to:
NatalieVibeTribe
@NatalieVibe
·
430d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
431d
The statement by @NatalieVibe constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about government involvement in healthcare, a significant public issue. The tone is corrective and aims to clarify misconceptions about government-run healthcare systems.
- The statement strives to do no harm by correcting misinformation, which can be seen as a positive contribution to the discourse. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying a misconception about government involvement in healthcare. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the content of the previous message without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to provide accurate information. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.