Gary Marcus

The statement critiques OpenAI's technological advancements and predicts a potential decline in the generative AI industry. It engages with public issues related to technology, corporate transparency, and market predictions, thus constituting public discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the tone is somewhat accusatory, which could be seen as harmful to OpenAI's reputation. Minor violation. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects privacy and dignity. Adheres well. [+2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is critical and somewhat confrontational. Minor violation. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the organization's actions and statements. Adheres well. [+2]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement does not address the possibility of acknowledging or correcting mistakes. Neutral.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to raise awareness about perceived issues in the AI industry, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment. Adheres well. [+2]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to discuss public concerns responsibly. Adheres well. [+2]