Gary Marcus

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 51
6/13/2024, 3:42:30 AM
X
In reply to:
Colonel Angus
@JE543201733071
·
527d
@GaryMarcus Holding a 2 of diamonds and a 4 of spades and going all in https://twitter.com/JE5432017330…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
527d
I don’t think people quite realize the significance of this moment, so I will spell it out: OpenAI has been bluffing all along, and their CTO just gave away the fact that they are not holding aces.

75% chance that the GenAI bubble will have burst by 12 months from today.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
527d
Wow! evidence from OpenAI itself in favor of my conjecture of diminishing returns.

The statement and the image provided engage in public discourse by discussing significant developments in the field of artificial intelligence and the business strategies of a major player, OpenAI. The conversation involves opinions and analysis on the potential future of AI and the financial strategies being employed, which are relevant to societal and economic discussions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the tone of the conversation could be seen as critical or dismissive of OpenAI's strategies.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals involved, focusing on the business and strategic aspects rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a critical analysis of a significant public issue.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue, though it could be seen as somewhat dismissive of OpenAI's strategies. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to discuss significant societal issues related to AI and business strategies, contributing to the public discourse. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss significant public issues. [+1]