Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 49
6/13/2024, 3:45:46 AM
X
In reply to:
Josh Mobley Music ⚡️
@joshmobleymusic
·
527d
@GaryMarcus I’m not sure that it matters. The damage that will be done with the models that are already out there are significant. These music models probably have a lot of runway left before they start hitting a brick wall and by then, The damage will be complete.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
527d
Wow! evidence from OpenAI itself in favor of my conjecture of diminishing returns.
Tsarathustra
@tsarnick
·
527d
Mira Murati says the AI models that OpenAI have in their labs are not much more advanced than those which are publicly available

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the societal impact of AI models, particularly in the context of music. The tone is analytical and reflective, aiming to contribute to the ongoing debate about the benefits and drawbacks of AI technology.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a reasoned response to a complex issue. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging the damage done and questioning the social benefits, which can foster a more nuanced discussion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It builds on the previous points made in the conversation. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue. [+1]