In reply to:
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
414d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the concept of national interests and military preparedness in the context of global interdependence and collaboration.
- The statement does not directly cause harm with words and actions, but it does imply criticism of current policies without inflammatory language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the need to reconsider our approach to national interests and war preparation. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of current policies without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a shift in policy towards more peaceful and collaborative international relations, which can be seen as betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss important societal issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.