In reply to:
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
413d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
413d
The statement engages with public issues related to national defense, military policy, and the implications of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). It responds to a broader conversation about national interests and global interdependence, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a somewhat alarmist tone, which could be seen as contributing to fear rather than constructive dialogue. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It focuses on the dangers and the need for high alert, which could be seen as fear-mongering. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It addresses the issue at hand, which is constructive. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about a significant policy issue, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.