Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement criticizes OpenAI's decision to hire Paul M. Nakasone, alleging his involvement in illegal mass surveillance activities. The tone is accusatory and suggests distrust towards OpenAI based on this hiring decision.
- The statement could be seen as harmful as it makes serious allegations without providing concrete evidence, potentially damaging reputations. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of Paul M. Nakasone, as it accuses him of illegal activities without substantiation, which could be considered a form of harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters distrust and suspicion. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against Paul M. Nakasone and OpenAI. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does so in a manner that may not be responsible or uphold integrity, given the serious nature of the accusations without evidence. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.