Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 30

The statement in question is a reply to a conversation about AI and its potential future developments. It includes a link to an article titled 'AGI by 2027? - by Gary Marcus - Marcus on AI' and a brief description 'Fun with charts.' This statement does constitute public discourse as it engages with a substantive public issue—Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and its potential timeline, which is a topic of significant societal interest and debate.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is neutral and simply shares a resource for further reading. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by providing a link to an article that presumably offers more information on the topic. However, the description 'Fun with charts' might be seen as trivializing a serious issue, which could detract from promoting empathy and compassion.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a straightforward reply that adds to the dialogue. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by sharing a relevant resource without any inflammatory or irresponsible content. [+1]