Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47

Score 63

@fchollet @WIRED I think 2032 is within the realm of the possible but unlikely.

And (agreeing with you) no it will not immediately grant us immortality etc. Biology will still require a lot of hard work and long term studies.

Care to say more re your last clause?

6/15/2024, 12:57:27 AM

In reply to:

François Chollet

@fchollet

520d

@GaryMarcus @WIRED 2032 is optimistic but not too far off. Here's the thing though -- the rise of AGI will look nothing like he believes

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

520d

*Kurzweil* has moved back his timeline.

Why isn’t anyone talking about that?

For years, even as recently as April, Kurzweil projected 2029 for AGI; now he is expressing uncertainty for the first time, backpedaling a few years to 2032 @WIRED.

This on the heels of Murati…

The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the timeline for achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and its implications, which is a significant public issue. The tone is respectful and seeks further clarification, promoting constructive dialogue.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does no harm and maintains a respectful tone, contributing positively to the discourse. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging the complexity of biological advancements and the need for long-term studies. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue, asking for further clarification rather than attacking the other person's viewpoint. [+1]