In reply to:
Kinyanjui Carrington 🇰🇪🇬🇭🇿🇦 ⏯️
@1carringtone
·
518d
The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in a discussion about the effectiveness and limitations of deep learning models, specifically transformers and LSTMs. This is a substantive engagement with a public issue in the field of artificial intelligence, making it part of public discourse. The tone of the statement is somewhat dismissive and sarcastic, indicating a lack of respect for differing opinions.
- The statement does not strive to do harm directly, but the dismissive tone could be seen as undermining constructive dialogue. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others involved in the conversation, as it dismisses their views without engaging in a meaningful discussion. Moderate violation. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it dismisses the other person's perspective. Moderate violation. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the other person's view without providing a reasoned argument. Moderate violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.