Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76

The statement engages in a technical discussion about the limitations and potential solutions for text mangling in AI models, specifically within the context of large language models (LLMs). The tone is analytical and aims to contribute to the ongoing debate about the capabilities and future directions of AI technology.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm and focuses on a technical issue rather than personal attacks, thus adhering to this principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by discussing the technical aspects of AI and suggesting that alternative architectures could solve the problem, aligning with this principle. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific technical issue and providing a reasoned argument, without resorting to personal attacks, thus adhering to this principle. [+1]