Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
6/15/2024, 2:32:21 PM
X
In reply to:
Matthew Zeits
@MatthewZ73671
·
517d
@GaryMarcus There's only one reason that a 'not AGI, never AGI' type would want AI regulation, and that's to keep the little people from having a voice in the narrative.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
518d
Not sure who needs to read this, but if you are taking Aschenbrenner’s 2027 AGI prediction seriously, you ought peek at the link below.

The statement '@MatthewZ73671 who is never AGI? Certainly not me.' is a response in a conversation about AI regulation and AGI predictions. The tone is somewhat sarcastic and dismissive, and it appears to be a personal retort rather than a substantive engagement with the public issue of AI regulation or AGI predictions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but its sarcastic tone could be seen as dismissive, which might not promote a respectful dialogue. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not particularly respect the dignity of others either.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; instead, it makes a personal retort that could be seen as a minor personal attack. [-1]