Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
6/15/2024, 2:31:15 PM
X
In reply to:
Jonathan Marcus
@fastkoder
·
518d
@GaryMarcus That's a totally valid concern. We've also done causal experiments where we clamp features to high values and see the model behavior change predictably (Golden Gate Claude was one such example).
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
518d
Correlation is not causation.
Tsarathustra
@tsarnick
·
519d
Jonathan Marcus of Anthropic says AI models are not just repeating words, they are discovering semantic connections between concepts in unexpected and mind-blowing ways

The statement by @GaryMarcus engages in a substantive discussion about the nature of AI models and their interpretability, which is a significant public issue in the field of technology and ethics. The tone is analytical and aims to contribute to the ongoing debate about AI capabilities and limitations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is focused on a technical discussion, adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by planning to write about the topic, which aligns with promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue with integrity. [+1]