In reply to:
Wayne Holmes
@wayneholmes
·
516d
Filip Piekniewski🌻 🐘:@filippie509@techhub.social
@filippie509
·
517d
The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in a substantive discussion about the nature and implications of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. The conversation references academic work and public discussions, indicating an engagement with public issues related to technology and AI ethics. The tone is professional and academic, aiming to contribute to the understanding and critique of AI technologies.
- The statement does not cause harm and is part of a constructive academic dialogue. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by referencing previous discussions and publications, contributing to the broader discourse on AI ethics. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, focusing on the content of the discussion. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to contribute to the betterment of society by discussing important technological and ethical issues. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.