Gary Marcus

The statement by @GaryMarcus ('no. does she anything i have not said? she’s right that it ain’t happening soon') constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the timeline and feasibility of AI superintelligence, a significant public issue. The tone is dismissive and somewhat informal, aiming to refute the urgency suggested by the previous comments.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the dismissive tone could be seen as undermining constructive dialogue. Minor violation. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. Adheres to the principle. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on refutation. Minor violation. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the content of the discussion. Adheres to the principle. [+1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to engage in a public issue responsibly. Adheres to the principle. [+1]