In reply to:
Nirmal Patel
@fromnirmal
·
516d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
516d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the reliability and consistency of large language models (LLMs) in artificial intelligence, which is a significant public issue in the field of technology and ethics.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a technical critique rather than a personal attack. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by contributing to the discussion on the limitations of LLMs, which can foster a more informed public debate. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the reliability and consistency of LLMs without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing a thoughtful perspective to the ongoing debate. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.