Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
6/15/2024, 4:55:07 PM
X
In reply to:
CopyKate - ⏸️
@copykat510
·
516d
@GaryMarcus Is there a chance that a new or improved architecture could push progress in a similar way hyped and anticipated for LLMs?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
516d
Great illustration of this kind of extrapolation fallacy below:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
516d
There is a *huge* fallacy of extrapolation in the Hinton extract below that @elonmusk is hyping.

@geoffreyhinton says we know for sure that if we make LLMs bigger they will get better. We *don't* actually “know” that. It's been almost two years since GPT-4 was trained, nobody…
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
·
516d
Wise words from a recent interview with @geoffreyhinton, one of the smartest people in the world regarding AI

The statement 'i think the premises would have to be different, but yes' is a response to a discussion about the potential for new or improved architectures to push progress in AI, similar to the hype around large language models (LLMs). This conversation is part of a broader public discourse on the development and implications of AI technologies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is a constructive contribution to the discussion, suggesting a thoughtful consideration of the premises involved in the argument. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by engaging in a reasoned discussion about the premises of the argument, which can help others think more critically about the topic. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, focusing on the content of the argument rather than the individuals involved. [+1]