Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
6/15/2024, 8:15:19 PM
X
In reply to:
Greg ⏹️ Colbourn
@gcolbourn
·
515d
@TrueAIHound @GaryMarcus @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton Ok. He's definitely not a charlatan. If you think so then I don't think you have a very good world model.
AGIHound
@TrueAIHound
·
515d
@gcolbourn @GaryMarcus @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton Oh that. Yeah, I read part of it. Aschenbrenner is a crackpot and a charlatan in my opinion. He's probably in cahoots with that con artist, Sam Altman, while pretending otherwise.

I say what's on my mind. 😀
Greg ⏹️ Colbourn
@gcolbourn
·
515d
@TrueAIHound @GaryMarcus @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton No, it's a recent report: https://situational-awareness.ai…
AGIHound
@TrueAIHound
·
515d
@gcolbourn @GaryMarcus @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton No but I've heard of it. It sounds like another fancy AI term for context. Psychologists have been writing about that for decades.
Greg ⏹️ Colbourn
@gcolbourn
·
515d
@TrueAIHound @GaryMarcus @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton Have you read Situational Awareness?
AGIHound
@TrueAIHound
·
515d
@gcolbourn @GaryMarcus @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton Scaling is for weak minds, very weak minds, like Hinton's. 😇

The statement in question is part of a broader conversation about artificial general intelligence (AGI) and involves public figures in the AI community. It critiques a specific graph and links to an article, suggesting a substantive engagement with public issues related to AI development and its implications. Therefore, it constitutes public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does imply criticism of the graph and the venture fund, which could be seen as a minor negative impact. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a level of respect for privacy and dignity. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more critical in nature.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the graph and the venture fund, but it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to engage in a public issue responsibly. [+1]