Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
6/15/2024, 8:19:10 PM
X
In reply to:
Greg ⏹️ Colbourn
@gcolbourn
·
515d
@GaryMarcus @TrueAIHound @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton See my comment on your blog:
"Has anyone here actually read the report rather than just looked at the pictures and tweets about it? It seems Gary hasn't at least - all of his counters are addressed by Leopold in the text (and none of them are defeaters)."
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
515d
@gcolbourn @TrueAIHound @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton He does have a new venture fund to hype and that 2027 graph is just ridiculously problematic:

https://garymarcus.substack.com/…
Greg ⏹️ Colbourn
@gcolbourn
·
515d
@TrueAIHound @GaryMarcus @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton Ok. He's definitely not a charlatan. If you think so then I don't think you have a very good world model.
AGIHound
@TrueAIHound
·
515d
@gcolbourn @GaryMarcus @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton Oh that. Yeah, I read part of it. Aschenbrenner is a crackpot and a charlatan in my opinion. He's probably in cahoots with that con artist, Sam Altman, while pretending otherwise.

I say what's on my mind. 😀
Greg ⏹️ Colbourn
@gcolbourn
·
515d
@TrueAIHound @GaryMarcus @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton No, it's a recent report: https://situational-awareness.ai…
AGIHound
@TrueAIHound
·
515d
@gcolbourn @GaryMarcus @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton No but I've heard of it. It sounds like another fancy AI term for context. Psychologists have been writing about that for decades.

The statement 'I did *not* read the full thing, because that was bit so absurd.' is part of a larger conversation about a report on AI and its implications. The tone is dismissive and suggests a lack of engagement with the material being discussed. The intent appears to be to discredit the report without providing substantive critique.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The dismissive tone does not directly cause harm but does not contribute positively to the discourse either. Minor violation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. Neutral.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It dismisses the report without engaging with its content. Minor violation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the report without addressing specific points or engaging in a meaningful discussion. Significant violation. [-2]