Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
6/15/2024, 8:25:47 PM
X
In reply to:
Greg ⏹️ Colbourn
@gcolbourn
·
514d
@GaryMarcus @TrueAIHound @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton The Unhobbling section (linked above) is only 8 1/2 pages.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
514d
@gcolbourn @TrueAIHound @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton Give me an example; I am really not up for 165pp after something so sloppy.
Greg ⏹️ Colbourn
@gcolbourn
·
514d
@TrueAIHound @GaryMarcus @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton He addresses all of that in the report. Shame you'll never know where you are going wrong with your thinking.
AGIHound
@TrueAIHound
·
514d
@gcolbourn @GaryMarcus @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton No thanks. Intelligence isn't based on the statistics of word embeddings in texts created by humans. The stats come from human intelligence. Intelligence doesn't come from the stats. There's no new science in LLMs. We've known for centuries that language is highly statistical.
Greg ⏹️ Colbourn
@gcolbourn
·
514d
@TrueAIHound @GaryMarcus @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton This section in particular might be of interest (but I recommend taking the time to read the whole thing): https://situational-awareness.ai…
Greg ⏹️ Colbourn
@gcolbourn
·
514d
@TrueAIHound @GaryMarcus @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton Give it a couple of years, they will be everywhere (unless we Pause, of course!)

The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the validity and implications of AI research and projections, which are significant public issues. The tone is critical but not overtly hostile, and the intent appears to be to question the reliability of the data and projections presented by another party.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a critique of the data and projections, which is a normal part of academic and public discourse. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does engage in a critical analysis which can be seen as a part of constructive dialogue.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out specific issues with the graphs and time extrapolations. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]