Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
6/15/2024, 8:26:57 PM
X
In reply to:
AGIHound
@TrueAIHound
·
514d
@GaryMarcus @gcolbourn @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton He has no example. He's either a true believer or a BSer. 😀
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
514d
@gcolbourn @TrueAIHound @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton Give me an example; I am really not up for 165pp after something so sloppy.
Greg ⏹️ Colbourn
@gcolbourn
·
514d
@TrueAIHound @GaryMarcus @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton He addresses all of that in the report. Shame you'll never know where you are going wrong with your thinking.
AGIHound
@TrueAIHound
·
514d
@gcolbourn @GaryMarcus @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton No thanks. Intelligence isn't based on the statistics of word embeddings in texts created by humans. The stats come from human intelligence. Intelligence doesn't come from the stats. There's no new science in LLMs. We've known for centuries that language is highly statistical.
Greg ⏹️ Colbourn
@gcolbourn
·
514d
@TrueAIHound @GaryMarcus @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton This section in particular might be of interest (but I recommend taking the time to read the whole thing): https://situational-awareness.ai…
Greg ⏹️ Colbourn
@gcolbourn
·
514d
@TrueAIHound @GaryMarcus @elonmusk @geoffreyhinton Give it a couple of years, they will be everywhere (unless we Pause, of course!)

The statement and the preceding conversation involve a discussion about artificial intelligence, specifically the development and implications of large language models (LLMs) and artificial general intelligence (AGI). This is a substantive engagement with a public issue, making it a part of public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a neutral acknowledgment of another participant's contribution. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. There is no evidence of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does acknowledge another participant's contribution, which can be seen as a positive engagement.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by acknowledging an example provided by another participant. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]