Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
514d
@elonmusk @hiconcep @geoffreyhinton 1. Hinton actually makes a serious logical error: he says we know for sure that if we make LLMs bigger they will get better. We don't actually *know* that. It's been almost two years since GPT-4 was trained, nobody has been able to significantly outdo it. OpenAI recently…
6/15/2024, 9:26:09 PM
X
In reply to:
Paula Chandler
@SilverHollowsz
·
514d
@BillHuntBits @WashburneAlex @GaryMarcus Your thoughts?
Bill Hunt
@BillHuntBits
·
514d
This is by far the smartest take on Artificial Intelligence (AI)—where it is, where it’s going, and how we should think about it—that I’ve seen yet. It’s 14 minutes very worth watching.
Jon Erlichman
@JonErlichman
·
514d
“There is a 50-50 chance AI will get more intelligent than humans in the next 20 years. We’ve never had to deal with things more intelligent than us. And we should be very uncertain about what it will look like.”

~ Geoffrey Hinton

The statement 'Mostly on target except for one blunder' is a brief critique in a conversation about Artificial Intelligence (AI). It is part of a larger discussion involving public figures and experts in the field, making it a form of public discourse. The tone is neutral and the intent appears to be to provide constructive feedback.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm and is neutral in tone, adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement is brief and does not provide much context, but it does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is neutral in this regard.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a 'blunder' without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]