Reposted by Gary Marcus
Cory Doctorow NONCONSENSUAL BLUE TICK
@doctorow
·
543d
The statement engages in a public discourse about the future of AI technology, referencing opinions and predictions from notable figures in the field. The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive of current AI advancements, suggesting that they will not lead to significant breakthroughs. The statement also includes a metaphorical critique of AI development strategies.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the dismissive tone towards current AI efforts could be seen as undermining the work of those in the field. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains respect for privacy and dignity. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more critical and dismissive. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques the ideas and strategies rather than individuals. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to express a critical viewpoint on a public issue. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.