Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
6/17/2024, 8:06:34 PM
X
In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
508d
@GaryMarcus NGL, I need to research “neurosymbolic AI”
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
509d
Neurosymbolic AI’s moment is coming, perhaps any day
François Chollet
@fchollet
·
509d
@dwarkesh_sp This has been the most promising branch of approaches so far -- leveraging a LLM to help with discrete program search, by using the LLM as a way to sample programs or branching decisions. This is exactly what neurosymbolic AI is, for the record...

The statement 'See eg my next decade in AI' by @olivia_p_walker in response to a discussion about neurosymbolic AI and its potential future constitutes public discourse. The conversation involves substantive engagement with a significant topic in artificial intelligence, discussing the potential and current advancements in neurosymbolic AI and its comparison with other AI approaches.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is a neutral contribution to the discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by referencing further exploration and research in AI, encouraging others to look into the topic. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by contributing to the ongoing discussion without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to discuss advancements in AI, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by promoting knowledge and understanding in a significant field. [+1]