Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 56

The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the limitations and future directions of AI, specifically addressing the issues with large language models (LLMs) and the potential of neurosymbolic approaches. The tone is constructive and aims to promote a better understanding of AI technologies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and aims to contribute positively to the discourse on AI. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the technology rather than individuals. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and encourages addressing the limitations of current AI technologies honestly. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of LLMs and deep learning approaches without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to advocate for the betterment of AI technology, which can be seen as a contribution to societal betterment. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss important issues in AI. [+2]