Gary Marcus

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -1
6/20/2024, 7:46:40 PM
X
In reply to:
Tess Hegarty
@thegartsy
·
150d
@GaryMarcus @ilyasut They won’t slow down voluntarily, that seems clear. We disagree on (b).

With public demand, the gov can stop this race to nowhere.

Get your head out of the tech bubble!

Artists losing their livelihoods are organizing. The Pope is turning the attention of the Church on this.
Tess Hegarty
@thegartsy
·
150d
@GaryMarcus @ilyasut If @ilyasut truly believes he can build ASI, yet the majority of people polled do not want this “progress”, how is there moral fiber here?

Developing/not developing ASI is a choice. Not inevitable.

I am disturbed by the audacity to play savior in such a risky way.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
150d
I appreciate @ilyasut’s moral fiber and hope that he looks beyond LLMs, because I cannot see how to get to safe AI with LLMs alone.
Tess Hegarty
@thegartsy
·
150d
@GaryMarcus I’m curious what you think of Ilya’s new project?

The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of AI regulation and the societal impact of artificial intelligence. The tone is proactive and the intent is to mobilize public demand for government regulation of AI.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and aims to prevent potential harm by advocating for proper AI regulation. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by addressing the need for public demand to influence government action on AI regulation. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue and does not include personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the author's influence to advocate for societal betterment through proper AI regulation. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+2]