The statement 'Great list! But you forgot “LLMs are tantamount to AGI”' is a response to a conversation about commonly believed myths, suggesting that the belief that 'LLMs are tantamount to AGI' should be included in the list. The tone is lighthearted and constructive, aiming to contribute to the discussion by pointing out a perceived omission. The intent is to correct a misconception about the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and artificial general intelligence (AGI).
- The statement strives to do no harm and is intended to correct a misconception, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By addressing a common misconception, the statement promotes understanding and knowledge about the differences between LLMs and AGI, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by suggesting an addition to the list without attacking the original poster, aligning with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.